Summary on the association of left ventricular strain–volume loop characteristics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and clinical outcome

Before you continue: The content of this page is generated to facilitate the interpretation of research to individuals interested in cardiovascular healthcare. The content is not intended for personal medical advice. Summaries and interpretations of the authors of a study do not reflect my professional opinion. Research often takes years to decades before results are developed enough to implement in clinical healthcare because new findings need to be extensively validated before we consider them safe enough for individual patients. Always consult your own professional healthcare provider for medical advice.

The original article that is summarized on this page can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead117

Background information

Heart failure is a condition that affects millions of people worldwide and is associated with high rates of illness and death. The study focuses on a specific type of heart failure called heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which is characterized by a stiffening of the heart muscle that makes it difficult for the heart to fill with blood. The study aimed to explore the relationship between left ventricular strain-volume loops and adverse events in patients with HFpEF.

What are left ventricular strain-volume loops?

Left ventricular (LV) strain-volume loops are a graphical representation of the relationship between changes in LV volume and strain during the cardiac cycle. They provide insight into the characteristics of the heart’s systolic function (ejection phase) and diastolic function (filling phase). LV strain-volume loops may be a useful tool for understanding how the heart is functioning and can be used to diagnose and monitor heart conditions such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Graphical summary of article: Association of left ventricular strain–volumeloop characteristics with adverse events in
patients with heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction

For full image and article please go to: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead117

Methods used by researchers

The study used a retrospective analysis of data from patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) who underwent echocardiography. Echocardiography is a non-invasive imaging test that uses sound waves to create pictures/movies of the heart. The study analyzed left ventricular (LV) strain-volume loops, which are graphical representations of the relationship between changes in LV volume and strain during the cardiac cycle. The study measured the early diastolic slope of LV strain-volume loops and LV peak strain to determine their association with adverse events such as all-cause mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure. The study also adjusted for potential confounding factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities. Adjustment for confounding factors is performed to understand the true value of a new variable in addition to known factors that contribute to an outcome.

Results of the study

The study found that measuring the early diastolic slope of left ventricular (LV) strain-volume loops can be a useful tool for predicting adverse events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Patients with a steeper early diastolic slope are at a lower risk of experiencing adverse events such as all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization. The study also highlights the need for further research to identify effective therapeutic and diagnostic options for HFpEF patients.

Discussion by researchers of the study

The findings of this study suggest that measuring the early diastolic slope of left ventricular (LV) strain-volume loops can be a useful tool for predicting adverse events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This means that LV strain-volume loops can be a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying patients at lower risk of adverse events and for guiding treatment decisions. The study’s limitations are also discussed, including the fact that the study was retrospective and that the sample size was relatively small. The discussion concludes by emphasizing the importance of further research to better understand the pathophysiology of HFpEF and to identify effective treatment options for patients with this condition.

Reflection and open questions

A personal reflection on the results of the study or open questions shall be added later. If you have questions, please leave a comment.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *